This is the bad lede I chose last week:
“The concentration and exact
direction that the player wants to give the ball are some of billiards’
characteristics, a game that brings friends together, who perform over the
table shots to demonstrate who is the best.”
This is the lede I wrote to try to
make it better:
Billiards is not only about technical
skill, it is about intelligence. When Efren “The Magician” Reyes, the two-time
Filipino world champion, plays, he frowns his eyebrows and reflects
concentration. He imagines the balls’ course, designs an strategy, just as a
writer imagines their characters’ fortune. In billiards, there is precision
and science; ability and passion that surround Abraham Lincoln's favorite game.
What I did to improve the lede:
- I tried to make this lede more
interesting, using a literary tone, rather than an informative one.
- I included an important fact (Efren
Reyes part) as an excuse to make my point: that this game is not only about
skill, but intelligence.
- I didn't talk about any specific
rule or shot: That would come later in the story because it may sound boring to
mention it at the beginning for people that don't know much about the game
(except if the news is about a shot). The objective in this lede is that readers
continue with the story, not give a lot of facts about billiards’ structure.
- I included an interesting – not
necessary- fact (the Abraham Lincoln's part) to give the paragraph more color.
I really like the new lede you have written. It is much more clear for the reader to understand what you are writing about and adds credibility with your inclusion of the two-time Filipino world champion notation.
ReplyDelete